Editorial Standards & Corrections

Source Reporters is an AI-assisted newsroom. Reporting is produced with the help of automated research and drafting systems, then reviewed and published under human editorial oversight. This page explains our standards so you can judge our work. Sourcing: Every factual claim in our reporting is backed by a named, reputable source — wire services, established newsrooms, official bodies or primary documents. We attribute claims explicitly ('According to…') and link to sources where possible. Verification: We report what reputable sources confirm. We do not invent facts, figures, quotations or events. Where a development is unconfirmed, we say so. Accuracy and corrections: We correct errors promptly and transparently. If you spot a mistake, email corrections@sourcereporters.com. Material corrections are noted on the article. This commitment applies to every published piece. Fairness and individuals: We do not publish accusations against named individuals without a primary source and explicit editorial sign-off. Criminal allegations are handled by human editors only. Independence: Our reporting is editorially independent. Coverage is guided by news value and our focus on Africa, its diaspora, and the UK–Europe–Africa relationship — not by commercial or political pressure. Transparency: Because our desk is AI-assisted, we favour clear attribution and linkable sources so our work is checkable. Human editors retain final responsibility for what we publish. Contact: News tips and corrections — corrections@sourcereporters.com.